Note

On E-infinity- and DAlg-Descendability

Author: Wei Yang · Added:

Download the PDF

Article date: August 30, 2026.

Abstract

For a map R→SR\to S of E∞\mathbb{E}_\infty-rings, its nnth finite Amitsur stage is

Tot⁡n(S⊗R(∙+1)).\operatorname{Tot}^n\bigl(S^{\otimes_R(\bullet+1)}\bigr).

Antieau and Stefanich asked five questions about multiplicative retractions from these finite stages. We answer all five.

For every prime pp and every k≥2k\geq 2, the restriction map

C∗(BCpk;Fp)⟶C∗(BCp;Fp)C^*(BC_{p^k};\mathbb{F}_p)\longrightarrow C^*(BC_p;\mathbb{F}_p)

is descendable but not E∞\mathbb{E}_\infty-descendable, and hence is not DAlg\mathrm{DAlg}-descendable; for k=1k=1 the map is the identity. Thus ordinary and E∞\mathbb{E}_\infty-descendability differ even for cochains on finite cyclic pp-groups.

Complexification KO→KUKO\to KU is E∞\mathbb{E}_\infty-descendable: the unit

KO⟶Tot⁡5(KU⊗KO(∙+1))KO\longrightarrow \operatorname{Tot}^5\bigl(KU^{\otimes_{KO}(\bullet+1)}\bigr)

admits a retraction in CAlgKO\mathrm{CAlg}_{KO}. The units at stages 00, 11, and 22 do not split in CAlgKO\mathrm{CAlg}_{KO}, and the unit at stage 33 does not split even as an E1\mathbb{E}_1-KOKO-algebra map. Thus the least E∞\mathbb{E}_\infty-splitting stage is either 44 or 55.

Let AA be a Noetherian Fp\mathbb{F}_p-algebra of finite Krull dimension, put dA=max⁡{1,dim⁡A}d_A=\max\{1,\dim A\}, and let A→BA\to B be a faithfully flat map of discrete Fp\mathbb{F}_p-algebras. Without any finite-type hypothesis on BB, the unit admits a retraction in derived commutative AA-algebras

Tot⁡dA+1(B⊗A(∙+1))⟶A;\operatorname{Tot}^{d_A+1}\bigl(B^{\otimes_A(\bullet+1)}\bigr) \longrightarrow A;

specializing to Fp[x]→Fp[x1/p∞]\mathbb{F}_p[x]\to\mathbb{F}_p[x^{1/p^\infty}] gives a retraction at stage 22. The proof uses the first two natural layers of a free derived symmetric algebra, a two-term induced resolution over the Frobenius skew-polynomial ring A[F]A[F], and integral DAlg\mathrm{DAlg} flattening.